Jump to content

Talk:Warsaw Uprising (1794)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleWarsaw Uprising (1794) is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 11, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 18, 2006WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
August 8, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 17, 2006Featured article candidatePromoted
October 20, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
April 4, 2022Peer reviewReviewed
Current status: Former featured article

Peer review

[edit]

Okay, I spent quite some time on this article and perhaps it's time to draw more attention to correcting and improving it, so I asked for this article to be peer reviewed. Hopefully this willmake more people work on it. //Halibutt 07:11, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm... I'm happy to announce that my tactics of escape forwards has proven right one more time. This article's been a subject of lots of heated debates in the past. Judging by lack of comments it seems that expansion and sourcing of this article was a step in a good direction :) //Halibutt 06:43, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The image Image:Kilinski.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

B-class review

[edit]

This article is currently at start/C class, but could be improved to B-class if it had more (inline) citations. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 23:31, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: Done :) //Halibutt 01:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Halibutt: I've added a single cite req. As soon as it is fixed, I'll pass it for B-class, and I encourage you to submit it to WP:GAC. Some citations have the wrird ¶ symbol, please remove it or otherwise format it (I've never seen it discussed in MoS...). No other pre-GA comments, looks good! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: Done. The paragraph symbol (or ) is precisely what others suggested I use during pre-FAC assessment of the article on Battle of Radzymin (1920). And funny thing, you considered the symbol weird back then too (here) :). Anyway, to quote the relevant article, In academic writing, it is sometimes used as an in-text referencing tool to make reference to a specific paragraph from a document that does not contain page numbers - which is precisely how I used it. If you have alternative suggestions - feel free to state them, but I believe the proper symbol is the way to go. And as we're free to chose whichever referencing system we use as long as we're consistent, I see no problem with that. //Halibutt 06:52, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Live and learn. Good job - B class it is. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:14, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cool. On to GA status now and we'll have it back as a FA again in no time :D If only it worked this way these days... (see here). //Halibutt 20:13, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Warsaw Uprising (1794). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Warsaw Uprising (1794). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]